Four readers looked for links between the 72 vocabulary terms in seven seed papers. A link went into the ontology only when two different kinds of reader found it in the same paper. This page shows where they agreed, where they did not, and what came out.
| Reader | What it reads | What it returns | Papers | Same answer twice? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude | The whole paper, tables included, three times | Links with a word-for-word quote | All 7 | No (86% of links match) |
| Jev | One paragraph at a time; hosted by TypeSafe | Links with the paragraph and a probability | 4 open-licence papers | No (93–96% match) |
| winnow | One paragraph at a time; runs on this Mac | Same as Jev | All 7 | Yes, byte for byte |
| laya | One paragraph at a time; runs on this Mac | Same as Jev | All 7 | Yes, byte for byte |
Jev, winnow and laya are System One models: they answer four typed questions per paragraph (which terms, is there a relationship, which relation, which terms) and never write text. None of the three sees tables or figure text.
Each row is one combination of readers. The bar counts paper-and-link pairs where exactly those readers found the link. Green rows met the rule; amber rows went to the review list.
Real votes from the stored runs, with the words each reader pointed at. Highlights mark the phrase that carries the link. Click a reader to see the exact questions it was asked and what it answered, round by round.
All paper-and-link pairs that either went into the ontology or onto the review list. Click a row to see the quote and the paragraphs. Links that only one System One model found are left out.
| Link | Paper | Readers | Outcome |
|---|